FreeStyle:No Scientific Basis for Intelligent Design Hypotheses?

From ResearchID.org

or A Rhetorical Case for Intelligent Design

An accumulating list of incontrovertible facts about Intelligent Design.

Direct evidence:

1. Outside of biology, directly observable phenomena involving random chance and natural forces, working alone and together, do not have the ability to generate information.
2. Observable phenomena involving random chance and natural forces, working alone and together, never result in the production of another functioning entity, different from its own kind.
3. Observable phenomena possessing intelligence do have the ability to generate information.
4. Observable phenomena possessing intelligence do have the ability to design another functioning entity, different from its own kind.
5. There is no direct evidence that eliminates intelligence as a causal explanation within science.

Indirect evidence

1. Indirect evidence supporting the idea that random chance and natural forces, working alone and together, can generate 1)true and novel information or 2)designed functioning entities is derived only with the aid of a priori arguments.
2. There is no indirect evidence that eliminates intelligence as a causal explanation within science.

Remote evidence

1. Remote evidence supporting the idea that random chance and natural forces, working alone and together, can generate 1)true and novel information or 2)design independently functioning entities is derived only with the aid of a priori arguments.
2. There is no remote evidence that eliminates intelligence as a causal explanation within science.